Prospective evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and optimal biomarker enrichment strategy for nangibotide, a TREM-1 inhibitor, in patients with septic shock (ASTONISH): a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2b trial

医学 感染性休克 安慰剂 生物标志物 败血症 人口 临床试验 内科学 重症监护 休克(循环) 重症监护医学 病理 生物化学 化学 替代医学 环境卫生
作者
Bruno François,Simon Lambden,Tom Fivez,Sébastien Gibot,Marc Derive,Jean‐Marie Grouin,Margarita Salcedo‐Magguilli,Jérémie Lemarie,Nicolas De Schryver,Ville Jalkanen,Tarik Hicheur,Jean–Jacques Garaud,Valérie Cuvier,Ricard Ferrer,Morten H. Bestle,Ville Pettilä,Jean‐Paul Mira,Camille Bouisse,Emmanuelle Mercier,Joris Vermassen
出处
期刊:The Lancet Respiratory Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:11 (10): 894-904 被引量:31
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2213-2600(23)00158-3
摘要

Activation of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1) pathway is associated with septic shock outcomes. Data suggest that modulation of this pathway in patients with activated TREM-1 might improve survival. Soluble TREM-1 (sTREM-1), a potential mechanism-based biomarker, might facilitate enrichment of patient selection in clinical trials of nangibotide, a TREM-1 modulator. In this phase 2b trial, we aimed to confirm the hypothesis that TREM1 inhibition might improve outcomes in patients with septic shock.This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial assessed the efficacy and safety of two different doses of nangibotide compared with placebo, and aimed to identify the optimum treatment population, in patients across 42 hospitals with medical, surgical, or mixed intensive care units (ICUs) in seven countries. Non-COVID-19 patients (18-85 years) meeting the standard definition of septic shock, with documented or suspected infection (lung, abdominal, or urinary [in patients ≥65 years]), were eligible within 24 h of vasopressor initiation for the treatment of septic shock. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to intravenous nangibotide 0·3 mg/kg per h (low-dose group), nangibotide 1·0 mg/kg per h (high-dose group), or matched placebo, using a computer-generated block randomisation scheme (block size 3). Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. Patients were grouped according to sTREM-1 concentrations at baseline (established from sepsis observational studies and from phase 2a change to data) into high sTREM-1 (≥ 400 pg/mL). The primary outcome was the mean difference in total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score from baseline to day 5 in the low-dose and high-dose groups compared with placebo, measured in the predefined high sTREM-1 (≥ 400 pg/mL) population and in the overall modified intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included all-cause 28-day mortality, safety, pharmacokinetics, and evaluation of the relationship between TREM-1 activation and treatment response. This study is registered with EudraCT, 2018-004827-36, and Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04055909.Between Nov 14, 2019, and April 11, 2022, of 402 patients screened, 355 were included in the main analysis (116 in the placebo group, 118 in the low-dose group, and 121 in the high-dose group). In the preliminary high sTREM-1 population (total 253 [71%] of 355; placebo 75 [65%] of 116; low-dose 90 [76%] of 118; high-dose 88 [73%] of 121), the mean difference in SOFA score from baseline to day 5 was 0·21 (95% CI -1·45 to 1·87, p=0·80) in the low-dose group and 1·39 (-0·28 to 3·06, p=0·104) in the high-dose group versus placebo. In the overall population, the difference in SOFA score from baseline to day 5 between the placebo group and low-dose group was 0·20 (-1·09 to 1·50; p=0·76),and between the placebo group and the high-dose group was 1·06 (-0·23 to 2·35, p=0·108). In the predefined high sTREM-1 cutoff population, 23 (31%) patients in the placebo group, 35 (39%) in the low-dose group, and 25 (28%) in the high-dose group had died by day 28. In the overall population, 29 (25%) patients in the placebo, 38 (32%) in the low-dose, and 30 (25%) in the high-dose group had died by day 28. The number of treatment-emergent adverse events (111 [96%] patients in the placebo group, 113 [96%] in the low-dose group, and 115 [95%] in the high-dose group) and serious treatment-emergent adverse events (28 [24%], 26 [22%], and 31 [26%]) was similar between all three groups. High-dose nangibotide led to a clinically relevant improvement in SOFA score (of two points or more) from baseline to day 5 over placebo in those with higher cutoff concentrations (≥532 pg/mL) of sTREM-1 at baseline. Low dose nangibotide displayed a similar pattern with lower magnitude of effect across all cutoff values.This trial did not achieve the primary outcome of improvement in SOFA score at the predefined sTREM-1 value. Future studies are needed to confirm the benefit of nangibotide at higher concentrations of TREM-1 activation.Inotrem.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
cdercder应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
8秒前
RYK完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
甜甜灵槐完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
12秒前
縤雨完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
夏青荷发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
fy完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
xiang完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
阿飞完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
知否完成签到 ,获得积分0
24秒前
科研顺利完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
John完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
松鼠15111完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
TUTU完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
管理想完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
zzzyyyuuu完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
科研人员完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
刘一完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
六个核桃完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
zgsn完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
51秒前
章鱼完成签到,获得积分10
52秒前
敖江风云完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
啊凡完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
耍酷寻双完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Jeffrey完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
smm完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
嘿哈完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
怎么睡不醒完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Johnson完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
销户完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
细心的向日葵完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
阿饼完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
hyf完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
研友_Ze2wB8完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
iuhgnor完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
All the Birds of the World 4000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 3000
Animal Physiology 2000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2000
Am Rande der Geschichte : mein Leben in China / Ruth Weiss 1500
CENTRAL BOOKS: A BRIEF HISTORY 1939 TO 1999 by Dave Cope 1000
Machine Learning Methods in Geoscience 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3736760
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3280670
关于积分的说明 10020338
捐赠科研通 2997407
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1644533
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 782070
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 749656