Ten Years of VASARI Glioma Features: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Their Impact and Performance

BACKGROUND:

Visually Accessible Rembrandt (Repository for Molecular Brain Neoplasia Data) Images (VASARI) features, a vocabulary to establish reproducible terminology for glioma reporting, have been applied for a decade, but a systematic performance evaluation is lacking.

PURPOSE:

Our aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of the VASARI features set for glioma assessment.

DATA SOURCES:

MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched until September 26, 2023.

STUDY SELECTION:

Original articles predicting diagnosis, progression, and survival in patients with glioma were included.

DATA ANALYSIS:

The modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was applied to evaluate the risk-of-bias. The meta-analysis used a random effects model and forest plot visualizations, if ≥5 comparable studies with a low or medium risk of bias were provided.

DATA SYNTHESIS:

Thirty-five studies (3304 patients) were included. Risk-of-bias scores were medium (n = 33) and low (n = 2). Recurring objectives were overall survival (n = 18) and isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation (IDH; n = 12) prediction. Progression-free survival was examined in 7 studies. In 4 studies (glioblastoma n = 2, grade 2/3 glioma n = 1, grade 3 glioma n = 1), a significant association was found between progression-free survival and single VASARI features. The single features predicting overall survival with the highest pooled hazard ratios were multifocality (hazard ratio = 1.80; 95%-CI, 1.21–2.67; I² = 53%), ependymal invasion (hazard ratio = 1.73; 95% CI, 1.45–2.05; I² = 0%), and enhancing tumor crossing the midline (hazard ratio = 2.08; 95% CI, 1.35–3.18; I² = 52%). IDH mutation-predicting models combining VASARI features rendered a pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.76–0.88) at considerable heterogeneity (I² = 100%). Combined input models using VASARI plus clinical and/or radiomics features outperformed single data-type models in all relevant studies (n = 17).

LIMITATIONS:

Studies were heterogeneously designed and often with a small sample size. Several studies used The Cancer Imaging Archive database, with likely overlapping cohorts. The meta-analysis for IDH was limited due to a high study heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS:

Some VASARI features perform well in predicting overall survival and IDH mutation status, but combined models outperform single features. More studies with less heterogeneity are needed to increase the evidence level.