子宫切除术
机械人手术
子宫内膜癌
腹腔镜检查
透视图(图形)
医学
普通外科
外科
运营管理
癌症
计算机科学
人工智能
工程类
内科学
作者
Jason C. Barnett,John P. Judd,Jennifer M. Wu,Charles D. Scales,Evan R. Myers,Laura J. Havrilesky
标识
DOI:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181ee6e4d
摘要
In Brief OBJECTIVE: To use decision modeling to compare the costs associated with robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer. METHODS: Three separate models were used, each with sensitivity analysis: 1) a societal perspective model, which included inpatient hospital costs, robotic expenses, and lost wages and caregiver costs; 2) a hospital perspective plus robot costs model, which was identical to the societal perspective model but excluded lost wages and caregiver costs; and 3) a hospital perspective without robot costs model, which was identical to the hospital perspective plus robot costs model except that it excluded initial cost of the robot. RESULTS: The societal perspective model predicted laparoscopy ($10,128) as the least expensive approach followed by robotic and ($11,476) and open hysterectomy ($12,847). Societal perspective model sensitivity analyses predicted robotic hysterectomy to be least expensive when robotic disposable equipment cost less than $1,046 per case (baseline cost $2,394). In the hospital perspective plus robot costs model, laparoscopy was least expensive ($6,581) followed by open ($7,009) and robotic hysterectomy ($8,770); however, if hospital stay after open surgery was less than 2.9 days, open hysterectomy was least expensive. In the hospital perspective without robot costs model, laparoscopy remained least expensive, but robotic surgery became least expensive if the cost of robotic disposable equipment was reduced to less than $1,496 per case. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy is the least expensive surgical approach for the treatment of endometrial cancer. Robotic is less costly than abdominal hysterectomy when the societal costs associated with recovery time are accounted for and is most economically attractive if disposable equipment costs can be minimized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III Minimally invasive approaches to hysterectomy are less expensive than open hysterectomy for the management of endometrial cancer when accounting for the costs of recovery.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI