端粒酶逆转录酶
基因
生物
基因表达
细胞培养
成釉细胞瘤
永生化细胞系
分子生物学
癌症研究
端粒酶
遗传学
解剖
上颌骨
作者
Eduardo Luís de Souza Cruz,Felippe José Almeida Loureiro,Artur da Costa da Luiz Silva,Rommel Thiago Jucá Ramos,Maria Sueli da Silva Kataoka,João de Jesus Viana Pinheiro,Sérgio de Melo Alves Júnior
出处
期刊:Oral Diseases
[Wiley]
日期:2021-06-21
卷期号:28 (8): 2230-2238
被引量:7
摘要
Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare alterations in gene expression using two distinct immortalization methods (hTERT and HPV16‐E6/E7) in ameloblastoma cell lines. Materials and Methods A primary cell culture derived from human ameloblastoma (AME‐1) was established and immortalized by two different methods using a transfection processes to hTERT and HPV‐E6/E7. The RNA‐seq was used to verify which immortalization method had less influence on gene expression. It was performed in four steps: extraction and collection of mRNA, PCR amplification, comparison with the human reference genome, and analysis of differential expression. The genes with differentiated expression were identified and mapped. Results RNA‐seq revealed genetic alterations in ameloblastoma cell lines after the immortalization process, including increased expression of tumor genes like MYC, E2F1, BRAF, HRAS, and HTERT, and a decrease in tumor suppressor genes like P53, P21, and Rb. Conclusions It is possible to affirm that cell immortalization is not an inert method regarding gene regulation mechanisms and the hTERT method (AME‐TERT) presented fewer changes in gene expression levels.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI