No. 367-2019 Canadian Guideline for Physical Activity throughout Pregnancy

医学 指南 怀孕 产科 病理 遗传学 生物
作者
Michelle F. Mottola,Margie H. Davenport,Stephanie-May Ruchat,Gregory A.L. Davies,Veronica J. Poitras,Casey E Gray,Alejandra Jaramillo Garcia,Nick Barrowman,Kristi B. Adamo,Mary Duggan,Ruben Barakat,Phil Chilibeck,Karen G. Fleming,Milena Forte,Jillian Korolnek,Taniya S Nagpal,Linda Slater,Deanna Stirling,Lori Zehr
出处
期刊:Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada [Elsevier]
卷期号:40 (11): 1528-1537 被引量:88
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jogc.2018.07.001
摘要

The objective is to provide guidance for pregnant women, and obstetric care and exercise professionals, on prenatal physical activity.The outcomes evaluated were maternal, fetal, or neonatal morbidity or fetal mortality during and following pregnancy.Literature was retrieved through searches of Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL Plus with Full-text, Child Development & Adolescent Studies, ERIC, Sport Discus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Trip Database from database inception up to January 6, 2017. Primary studies of any design were eligible, except case studies. Results were limited to English, Spanish, or French language materials. Articles related to maternal physical activity during pregnancy reporting on maternal, fetal, or neonatal morbidity or fetal mortality were eligible for inclusion. The quality of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.The Guidelines Consensus Panel solicited feedback from end-users (obstetric care providers, exercise professionals, researchers, policy organizations, and pregnant and postpartum women). The development of this guideline followed the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument.The benefits of prenatal physical activity are moderate, and no harms were identified; therefore, the difference between desirable and undesirable consequences (net benefit) is expected to be moderate. The majority of stakeholders and end-users indicated that following these recommendations would be feasible, acceptable, and equitable. Following these recommendations is likely to require minimal resources from both individual and health systems perspectives.This guideline provide evidence-based recommendations regarding physical activity throughout pregnancy in the promotion of maternal, fetal, and neonatal health. In the absence of contraindications (see later for a detailed list), following this guideline is associated with: (1) fewer newborn complications (i.e., large for gestational age); and (2) maternal health benefits (i.e., decreased risk of preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, Caesarean section, instrumental delivery, urinary incontinence, excessive gestational weight gain, and depression; improved blood glucose; decreased total gestational weight gain; and decreased severity of depressive symptoms and lumbopelvic pain). Physical activity is not associated with miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, preterm birth, preterm/prelabour rupture of membranes, neonatal hypoglycemia, low birth weight, birth defects, induction of labour, or birth complications. In general, more physical activity (frequency, duration, and/or volume) is associated with greater benefits. However, evidence was not identified regarding the safety or additional benefit of exercising at levels significantly above the recommendations. Prenatal physical activity should be considered a front-line therapy for reducing the risk of pregnancy complications and enhancing maternal physical and mental health. For pregnant women not currently meeting this guideline, a progressive adjustment toward them is recommended. Previously active women may continue physical activity throughout pregnancy. Women may need to modify physical activity as pregnancy progresses. There may be periods when following the guideline is not possible due to fatigue and/or discomforts of pregnancy; women are encouraged to do what they can and to return to following the recommendations when they are able. This guideline were informed by an extensive systematic review of the literature, expert opinion, end-user consultation and considerations of feasibility, acceptability, costs, and equity.The specific recommendations in this 2019 Canadian Guideline for Physical Activity Throughout Pregnancy are provided below with corresponding statements indicating the quality of the evidence informing the recommendations and the strength of the recommendations (explanations follow).All pregnant women can participate in physical activity throughout pregnancy with the exception of those who have contraindications (listed below). Women with absolute contraindications may continue their usual activities of daily living but should not participate in more strenuous activities. Women with relative contraindications should discuss the advantages and disadvantages of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity with their obstetric care provider prior to participation. Absolute contraindications to exercise are the following: Relative contraindications to exercise are the following: STRENGTH OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS: The GRADE system was utilized to grade the strength of the recommendations. Recommendations are rated as strong or weak based on the: (1) balance between benefits and harms; (2) overall quality of the evidence; (3) importance of outcomes (i.e., values and preferences of pregnant women); (4) use of resources (i.e., cost); (5) impact on health equity; (6) feasibility, and (7) acceptability. Strong recommendation: Most or all pregnant women will be best served by the recommended course of action. Weak recommendation: Not all pregnant women will be best served by the recommended course of action; there is a need to consider other factors such as the individual's circumstances, preferences, values, resources available, or setting. Consultation with an obstetric care provider may assist in decision-making.The quality of the evidence refers to the level of confidence in the evidence and ranges from very low to high. High quality: The Guideline Consensus Panel is very confident that the estimated effect of physical activity on the health outcome is close to the true effect. Moderate quality: The Guideline Consensus Panel is moderately confident in the estimated effect of physical activity on the health outcome; the estimate of the effect is likely to be close to the true effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low quality: The Guideline Consensus Panel's confidence in the estimated effect of physical activity on the health outcome is limited; the estimate of the effect may be substantially different from the true effect. Very low quality: The Guideline Consensus Panel has very little confidence in the estimated effect of physical activity on the health outcome; the estimate of the effect is likely to be substantially different from the true effect. aThis was a weak recommendation because the quality of evidence was low, and the net benefit between women who were physically active and those who were not was small. bThis was a strong recommendation because, despite low quality evidence supporting physical activity during pregnancy for women categorized as overweight or obese, there was evidence from randomized controlled trials demonstrating an improvement in gestational weight gain and blood glucose. cModerate-intensity physical activity is intense enough to noticeably increase heart rate; a person can talk but not sing during activities of this intensity. Examples of moderate-intensity physical activity include brisk walking, water aerobics, stationary cycling (moderate effort), resistance training, carrying moderate loads, and household chores (e.g., gardening, washing windows). dThis was a weak recommendation because urinary incontinence was was not rated as a "critical" outcome and the evidence was low quality. eThis was a weak recommendation because: (1) the quality of evidence was very low; and (2) although harms were investigated there was limited available information to inform the balance of benefits and harms. This recommendation was primarily based on expert opinion.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
pilipuppychan发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
3秒前
QDL关注了科研通微信公众号
4秒前
FashionBoy应助yz采纳,获得10
5秒前
朱朱发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
英姑应助Yvonne采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
天秀之合完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
华仔应助石友瑶采纳,获得10
9秒前
feng_qi001完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
15秒前
情怀应助活泼的冷风采纳,获得10
16秒前
胡图图发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
旺仔完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
24秒前
莫里亚蒂完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
Akim应助彭三忘采纳,获得20
25秒前
26秒前
CipherSage应助themanell采纳,获得10
26秒前
波啊发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
28秒前
不器发布了新的文献求助50
28秒前
棒棒糖完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
yz发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
Soda完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
32秒前
英姑应助LU采纳,获得10
32秒前
32秒前
传奇3应助通义千问采纳,获得10
33秒前
33秒前
May应助zz采纳,获得10
33秒前
墨与笙发布了新的文献求助30
34秒前
34秒前
传奇3应助奋斗的小猪采纳,获得10
35秒前
36秒前
彭于晏应助耳东采纳,获得10
36秒前
38秒前
琪小7发布了新的文献求助10
39秒前
39秒前
高分求助中
Exploring Mitochondrial Autophagy Dysregulation in Osteosarcoma: Its Implications for Prognosis and Targeted Therapy 4000
Impact of Mitophagy-Related Genes on the Diagnosis and Development of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma via Single-Cell RNA-seq Analysis and Machine Learning Algorithms 2000
Migration and Wellbeing: Towards a More Inclusive World 1200
How to Create Beauty: De Lairesse on the Theory and Practice of Making Art 1000
Evolution 1000
Gerard de Lairesse : an artist between stage and studio 670
On the Refined Urban Stormwater Modeling 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 免疫学 细胞生物学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2969341
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2631943
关于积分的说明 7090125
捐赠科研通 2265430
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1201358
版权声明 591450
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 587457