医学
狼牙棒
部分流量储备
心脏病学
内科学
血运重建
心肌梗塞
罪魁祸首
狭窄
血管造影
冠状动脉疾病
冠状动脉造影
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
作者
Ayman Elbadawi,Alexander Dang,Mohamed Hamed,Mennaallah Eid,Meghana Prakash Hiriyur Prakash,Mohammed Saleh,Mohamed M. Gad,Mamas A. Mamas,Faisal Rahman,Islam Y. Elgendy
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2022.01.002
摘要
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided versus angiography-guided approaches for nonculprit stenosis among patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease.BACKGROUND The optimal strategy to guide revascularization of nonculprit stenosis among patients with STEMI and multivessel disease remains uncertain.METHODS Electronic databases were searched for randomized trials evaluating the outcomes of culprit-only revascularization, angiography-guided complete revascularization (CR), or FFR-guided CR.A pairwise meta-analysis comparing CR versus culprit-only revascularization and a network meta-analysis comparing the different revascularization techniques were conducted.The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTSThe analysis included 11 trials with 8,195 patients.CR (ie, angiography-guided or FFR-guided CR) was associated with a lower incidence of MACE (odds ratio [OR]: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.59), cardiovascular mortality (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.98), recurrent myocardial infarction (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.95), and repeat ischemia-driven revascularization (OR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.35).Network meta-analysis demonstrated that the incidence of MACE was lower with both angiography-guided CR (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.58) and FFR-guided CR (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.78) compared with a culprit-only approach, while there was no difference in risk for MACE between angiography-guided and FFR-guided CR (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.51 to 1.29).CONCLUSIONS Among patients with STEMI and multivessel disease, CR, with angiographic or FFR guidance for nonculprit stenosis, was associated with lower incidence of adverse events compared with culprit-only revascularization.FFR-guided CR was not superior to angiography-guided CR in reducing the incidence of adverse events.Future studies investigating other tools to risk-stratify nonculprit stenoses are encouraged.(
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI