医学
持续气道正压
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停
科克伦图书馆
荟萃分析
随机对照试验
唑吡坦
优势比
镇静剂
置信区间
子群分析
苯二氮卓
失眠症
麻醉
内科学
精神科
受体
作者
Donghao Wang,Yongkang Tang,Yanghang Chen,Sun Zhang,Danjie Ma,Yateng Luo,Shiwei Li,Xiaofen Su,Xinni Wang,Chunli Liu,Nuofu Zhang
出处
期刊:Sleep
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2021-03-26
卷期号:44 (8)
被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsab077
摘要
Abstract Study Objectives This meta-analysis aimed to explore the effect of non-benzodiazepine sedative hypnotics (NBSH) on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) adherence in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods We conducted a systematic search through PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus and ClinicalTrials (all searched from inception to August 15, 2020). Publications were limited to articles, clinical conferences and letters, including randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies. We used a random-effects model to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with corresponding confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analyses were conducted to analyze the sources of heterogeneity. Results Eight studies fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria for patients newly diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea. Overall, the use of NBSH was associated with increased use of CPAP per night (MD = 0.62 h; 95% CI = 0.26–0.98) and use for more nights (MD = 12.08%; 95% CI = 5.27–18.88). When a study seriously affecting heterogeneity was removed, more patients adhered well with CPAP use (pooled OR = 2.48; 95% CI = 1.75–3.52) with good adherence defined as CPAP use for >4 h/night on >70% of nights. Among prescribed NBSHs, eszopiclone showed the most significant effect on CPAP adherence. Conclusion CPAP adherence may increase in OSA patients treated with non-benzodiazepine sedative hypnotics especially eszopiclone. The effect of zolpidem and zaleplon on CPAP adherence requires further investigation by larger scale, randomized, controlled trials.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI