竞争对手分析
激励
业务
灵活性(工程)
订单(交换)
竞赛(生物学)
市场支配力
市场份额
产业组织
经济
公共经济学
环境经济学
营销
财务
市场经济
生物
管理
生态学
垄断
作者
Maarten Dubois,Rob Hoogmartens,Steven Van Passel,Karel Van Acker,Ive Vanderreydt
标识
DOI:10.1177/0734242x15600053
摘要
In an increasingly complex waste market, market-based policy instruments, such as disposal taxes, can give incentives for sustainable progress while leaving flexibility for innovation. However, implementation of disposal taxes is often criticised by domestic waste handlers that fear to be outcompeted by competitors in other countries. The article discusses three innovative market-based instruments that limit the impact on international competitiveness: Tradable recycling credits, refunded disposal taxes and differentiated disposal taxes. All three instruments have already been implemented for distinct environmental policies in Europe. In order to illustrate how these instruments can be used for waste policy, the literature review is complemented with a case study on shredder residues from metal-containing waste streams in Belgium. The analysis shows that a conventional disposal tax remains the most efficient, simple and transparent instrument. However, if international competition is a significant issue or if political support is weak, refunded and differentiated disposal taxes can have an added value as second-best instruments. Tradable recycling credits are not an appropriate instrument for use in small waste markets with market power. In addition, refunded taxes create similar incentives, but induce lower transactions costs.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI