最后通牒赛局
亲社会行为
独裁者
可能性
收益
没有人
心理学
经验证据
实验经济学
实证研究
利他主义(生物学)
优生性
社会心理学
独裁者赛局
实证经济学
经济
自私
微观经济学
政治
逻辑回归
政治学
生物
计算机安全
哲学
医学
植物
内科学
计算机科学
会计
法学
认识论
膜翅目
作者
Carlos Alós‐Ferrer,Jaume García-Segarra,Alexander Ritschel
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41562-021-01170-0
摘要
The seemingly rampant economic selfishness suggested by many recent corporate scandals is at odds with empirical results from behavioural economics, which demonstrate high levels of prosocial behaviour in bilateral interactions and low levels of dishonest behaviour. We design an experimental setting, the 'Big Robber' game, where a 'robber' can obtain a large personal gain by appropriating the earnings of a large group of 'victims'. In a large laboratory experiment (N = 640), more than half of all robbers took as much as possible and almost nobody declined to rob. However, the same participants simultaneously displayed standard, predominantly prosocial behaviour in Dictator, Ultimatum and Trust games. Thus, we provide direct empirical evidence showing that individual selfishness in high-impact decisions affecting a large group is compatible with prosociality in bilateral low-stakes interactions. That is, human beings can simultaneously be generous with others and selfish with large groups.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI