Patient-reported Outcomes Utilizing the Breast-Q Questionnaire After Breast Conserving Surgery With and Without Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract Oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) arose to decrease the deformity following breast conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer. In this meta-analysis (MA), we pool Breast-Q™ questionnaire data to compare quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer patients who received BCS alone or in combination with Level I or II oncoplastic breast surgery (BCS+OBS). All relevant databases were searched following the PRISMA and QUOROM guidelines. All prospective or retrospective studies with a BCS or BCS+OBS cohort that reported QOL as assessed with the Breast-Q™ questionnaire were eligible. Fifty-five studies (75 distinct patient cohorts; 11,186 patients) were included in the MA, with 12 studies reporting both pre- and postoperative values and eligible for a pairwise MA. The pairwise MA showed a significant postoperative improvement in the overall satisfaction with the breast (MD +8.0%, p=0.003) and in the psychosocial well-being (MD +9.2%, 3.5-14.8, p=0.001) of the entire cohort (BCS and BCS+OBS). A subgroup MA of proportions highlighted a superiority of BCS+OBS to BCS in terms of overall satisfaction with the breast (72.0%, 68.0-76.1, versus 62.9%, 58.3-67.5; p=0.02) and psychosocial well-being (78.9%, 71.5-86.4, versus 73.3%, 67.3-76.5, p=0.0001). A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis confirmed the results of the pairwise MA and the MA of proportions. Oncoplastic breast surgery effectively improves QoL based on the patient-reported outcomes assessed using the Breast-Q™ questionnaire. The improvements were associated with acceptable complication rates, further supporting the use of BCS followed by OBS where mastectomy would otherwise be necessary.