批评
心理学
背景(考古学)
礼貌
表达式(计算机科学)
印象形成
对话
论证(复杂分析)
社会心理学
口译(哲学)
感知
语言学
认知心理学
认识论
社会认知
哲学
文学类
沟通
计算机科学
医学
艺术
古生物学
神经科学
内科学
生物
程序设计语言
作者
James Boylan,Albert N. Katz
标识
DOI:10.1080/0163853x.2012.747041
摘要
In the context of texts that depicted either a minimally confrontational conversation (study 1) or a more confrontational argument (study 2) with a close friend, the use of ironic criticism was rated as being more humorous, polite, and positive, yet also as more sarcastic and mocking than direct criticism. Although our results were consistent with those reported previously, the results of both studies did not support two theoretical explanations of the function ironic criticism. We were unable to demonstrate that participant interpretation of ironic criticism was significantly influenced by the magnitude of the contrast created between criticism and the context in which the criticism is embedded, or by the focus of attention to either speaker's intent or the impression. Two novel findings emerged. First, ironic expression (but not direct expression) caused failed expectations targeted by criticism to appear less negative. Second, we found greater concordance between ratings of speaker intention and social impression for ratings of ironic expression than for directly expressed criticism.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI