奇纳
物理医学与康复
痉挛
医学
心理干预
物理疗法
科克伦图书馆
循证医学
梅德林
随机对照试验
护理部
替代医学
外科
政治学
病理
法学
作者
Lindsey A. Kerr,Vanessa Jewell,Lou Jensen
标识
DOI:10.5014/ajot.2020.029454
摘要
Spasticity is one of the most common and disabling motor impairments after stroke.To examine the evidence for the effectiveness of stretching interventions, including splinting, on reducing upper extremity spasticity, increasing hand function, and improving functional tasks for adults with poststroke spasticity.Databases searched were MEDLINE, CINAHL, OTseeker, AgeLine, and the Cochrane Library; results were limited to studies published from 2004 to January 2017.Following PRISMA guidelines, we included articles describing Level I-III studies with participants who were adults with upper extremity spasticity and received a stretching intervention.Eleven articles describing 6 Level I and 5 Level III studies met inclusion criteria.For reducing upper extremity spasticity, low strength of evidence was found to support the use of static splinting, strong strength of evidence was found for the use of stretching devices, and low strength of evidence was found to support the use of dynamic splinting; no evidence was found for manual stretching to address spasticity. For increasing hand function, moderate strength of evidence was found to support the use of static splinting, dynamic splinting, and manual stretching, and low strength of evidence was found for the use of stretching devices. For improving functional tasks, moderate strength of evidence was found to support the use of static splinting, dynamic splinting, and manual stretching, and low strength of evidence was found for the use of stretching devices.This updated synthesis summarizes the current literature regarding the effectiveness of stretching interventions to improve poststroke spasticity, hand function, and functional tasks.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI