卡巴齐塔塞尔
医学
前列腺癌
中性粒细胞减少症
发热性中性粒细胞减少症
随机对照试验
内科学
毒性
泌尿科
外科
肿瘤科
癌症
雄激素剥夺疗法
作者
Aurelius Omlin,Richard Cathomas,Gunhild von Amsberg,Christoph Reuter,Susan Feyerabend,Wolfgang Loidl,Martin Boegemann,Anja Lorch,Axel Heidenreich,Igor Tsaur,Julian Larcher‐Senn,Stefan A.J. Buck,Ron H.J. Mathijssen,Ulrich Jaehde,Silke Gillessen,Markus Joerger
标识
DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3360
摘要
There is ongoing controversy about the recommended dose of cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).This multicenter phase II open-label, randomized, parallel-group study compared 3-weekly cabazitaxel at 25 mg/m2 (conventional arm A) with cabazitaxel therapeutic drug monitoring (experimental arm B) in mCRPC. The primary objective was to improve the clinical feasibility rate (CFR), defined as the absence of grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, any thrombocytopenia with bleeding, febrile neutropenia, severe nonhematologic toxicity, withdrawal for cabazitaxel-related toxicity, or death. A total of 60 patients had to be randomized to detect a difference in CFR of 35% (power 80%, two-sided alpha 10%).A total of 40 patients were randomized to arm A and 33 patients to arm B. CFR was 69.4% in arm A and 64.3% in arm B (P = 0.79). Week-12 PSA response was 38.5% in both arms. A radiological response by RECIST v.1.1 was seen in 3 (9.7%) patients in arm A versus 6 (23.1%) patients in arm B (P = 0.28), disease progression was higher in arm A compared with arm B (61.3% vs. 30.8%, P = 0.05). Median progression-free survival was longer in arm B compared with arm A (9.5 vs. 4.4 months; HR = 0.46; P = 0.005). Median overall survival was higher in arm B compared with arm A (16.2 vs. 7.3 months; HR = 0.33; P < 0.0001).Pharmacokinetic-guided dosing of cabazitaxel in patients with mCRPC is feasible and improves clinical outcome due to individual dose escalations in 55% of patients.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI