医学
围手术期医学
围手术期
分级(工程)
审计
梅德林
结果(博弈论)
临床试验
心理干预
替代医学
重症监护医学
外科
护理部
土木工程
管理
数理经济学
数学
病理
政治学
法学
工程类
经济
作者
Ib Jammer,Nadine Wickboldt,Michael Sander,Andrew Smith,Marcus J. Schultz,Paolo Pelosi,Brigitte Leva,Andrew Rhodes,Andreas Hoeft,Bernhard Walder,Michelle S. Chew,Rupert M. Pearse
标识
DOI:10.1097/eja.0000000000000118
摘要
There is a need for large trials that test the clinical effectiveness of interventions in the field of perioperative medicine. Clinical outcome measures used in such trials must be robust, clearly defined and patient-relevant. Our objective was to develop standards for the use of clinical outcome measures to strengthen the methodological quality of perioperative medicine research. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and opinion leaders worldwide were invited to nominate papers that they believed the group should consider. The full texts of relevant articles were reviewed by the taskforce members and then discussed to reach a consensus on the required standards. The report was then circulated to opinion leaders for comment and review. This report describes definitions for 22 individual adverse events with a system of severity grading for each. In addition, four composite outcome measures were identified, which were designed to evaluate postoperative outcomes. The group also agreed on standards for four outcome measures for the evaluation of healthcare resource use and quality of life. Guidance for use of these outcome measures is provided, with particular emphasis on appropriate duration of follow-up. This report provides clearly defined and patient-relevant outcome measures for large clinical trials in perioperative medicine. These outcome measures may also be of use in clinical audit. This report is intended to complement and not replace other related work to improve assessment of clinical outcomes following specific surgical procedures.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI