卡格列净
医学
血糖性
蛋白尿
2型糖尿病
安慰剂
内科学
肾功能
糖化血红素
析因分析
糖尿病
随机对照试验
泌尿科
内分泌学
病理
替代医学
作者
Sjoukje van der Hoek,Niels Jongs,Megumi Oshima,Brendon L. Neuen,Jasper Stevens,Vlado Perkovic,Adeera Levin,Kenneth W. Mahaffey,Carol A. Pollock,Tom Greene,David C. Wheeler,Meg Jardine,Hiddo J.L. Heerspink
出处
期刊:Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
[American Society of Nephrology]
日期:2023-03-31
卷期号:18 (6): 748-758
被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.2215/cjn.0000000000000161
摘要
Background In the Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) trial, the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor canagliflozin improved kidney and cardiovascular outcomes and reduced the rate of estimated glomerular filtration decline (eGFR slope) in patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD. In other clinical trials of patients with CKD or heart failure, the protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on eGFR slope were greater in participants with versus participants without type 2 diabetes. This post hoc analysis of the CREDENCE trial assessed whether the effects of canagliflozin on eGFR slope varied according to patient subgroups by baseline glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Methods CREDENCE (ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT02065791]) was a randomized controlled trial in adults with type 2 diabetes with an HbA1c of 6.5%–12.0%, an eGFR of 30–90 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , and a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 300–5000 mg/g. Participants were randomly assigned to canagliflozin 100 mg once daily or placebo. We studied the effect of canagliflozin on eGFR slope using linear mixed-effects models. Results The annual difference in total eGFR slope was 1.52 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11 to 1.93) slower in participants randomized to canagliflozin compared with placebo. The rate of eGFR decline was faster in those with poorer baseline glycemic control. The mean difference in total eGFR slope between canagliflozin and placebo was greater in participants with poorer baseline glycemic control (difference in eGFR slope of 0.39, 1.36, 2.60, 1.63 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 for HbA1c subgroups 6.5%–7.0%, 7.0%–8.0%, 8.0%–10.0%, 10.0%–12.0%, respectively; P interaction = 0.010). The mean difference in change from baseline in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio between participants randomized to canagliflozin and placebo was smaller in patients with baseline HbA1c 6.5%–7.0% (−17% [95% CI, −28 to −5]) compared with those with an HbA1c of 7.0%–12% (−32% [95% CI, −40 to −28]; P interaction = 0.03). Conclusions The effect of canagliflozin on eGFR slope in patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD was more pronounced in patients with higher baseline HbA1c, partly because of the more rapid decline in kidney function in these individuals. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: Evaluation of the Effects of Canagliflozin on Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Participants With Diabetic Nephropathy (CREDENCE), NCT02065791 Podcast This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2023_06_08_CJN0000000000000161.mp3
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI