反事实思维
稳健性(进化)
先验概率
计量经济学
产品(数学)
问责
经济
计算机科学
人工智能
心理学
数学
社会心理学
法学
贝叶斯概率
政治学
化学
生物化学
几何学
基因
标识
DOI:10.1509/jmkr.40.1.65.19129
摘要
The author investigates scenario generation and analogical reasoning as potential sources of bias in new product forecasting. In a series of studies, scenarios and analogies are shown to have persistent effects on judgment, despite subsequent use of corrective analytic techniques (e.g., counterfactual reasoning, counterscenarios, counteranalogies, decomposition, accountability). These findings demonstrate the robustness of nonanalytic processes on judgment and the need to be aware of their seductive effects.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI