医学
医学物理学
考试(生物学)
乳腺摄影术
乳腺癌筛查
梅德林
乳腺癌
质量(理念)
物理疗法
家庭医学
癌症
内科学
古生物学
哲学
认识论
政治学
法学
生物
作者
Tanya Geertse,Ellen Paap,Daniëlle van der Waal,Luciën E. M. Duijm,Ruud M. Pijnappel,Mireille J. M. Broeders
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2019.04.016
摘要
The authors evaluate whether supplemental training for radiologists improves their breast screening performance and how this is measured.A systematic search was conducted in PubMed on August 3, 2017. Articles were included if they described supplemental training for radiologists reading mammograms to improve their breast screening performance and at least one outcome measure was reported. Study quality was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument.Of 2,199 identified articles, 18 were included, of which 17 showed improvement on at least one of the outcome measures, for at least one training activity or subgroup. Two measurement approaches were found. For the first approach, measuring performance on test sets, sensitivity, and specificity were the most reported outcomes (8 of 11 studies). Recall rate is the most reported outcome (6 of 7 studies) for the second approach, which measures performance in actual screening practice. The studies were mainly of moderate quality (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument score 11.7 ± 1.7), caused by small sample sizes and the lack of a control group.Supplemental training helps radiologists improve their screening performance, despite the mainly moderate quality of the studies. There is a need for better designed studies. Future studies should focus on performance in actual screening practice and should look for methods to isolate the training effect. If test sets are used, focus should be on knowledge about correlation between performance on test sets and actual screening practice.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI