Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance thifensulfuron‐methyl

小黑麦 欧盟委员会 背景(考古学) 杀虫剂 风险评估 食品安全 欧洲联盟 环境卫生 业务 农学 生物 食品科学 医学 计算机安全 计算机科学 古生物学 经济政策
出处
期刊:EFSA Journal [Publications Office of the European Union]
卷期号:13 (7) 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4201
摘要

EFSA JournalVolume 13, Issue 7 4201 Conclusion on PesticideOpen Access Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance thifensulfuron-methyl European Food Safety Authority, European Food Safety AuthoritySearch for more papers by this author European Food Safety Authority, European Food Safety AuthoritySearch for more papers by this author First published: 23 July 2015 https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4201Citations: 4 Correspondence: pesticides.peerreview@efsa.europa.eu Published date: 23 July 2015 Question number: EFSA-Q-2014-00626 On request from: European Commission AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authority of the rapporteur Member State the United Kingdom, for the pesticide active substance thifensulfuron-methyl are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1141/2010 as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 380/2013. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of thifensulfuron-methyl as a herbicide on spring cereals (wheat, barley, oat, rye), winter cereals (wheat, barley, oat, rye, triticale), corn/maize and soybeans. The reliable endpoints concluded as being appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, derived from the available studies and literature in the dossier peer reviewed, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified. References ACD/ChemSketch, Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc., ACD/Labs Release: 12.00 Product version: 12.00 (Build 29305, 25 Nov 2008). EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2004. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request from EFSA on the FOCUS groundwater models comparability and the consistency of this risk assessment of groundwater contamination. The EFSA Journal 2004, 93, 1– 20. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2004.93. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2007. Opinion on a request from EFSA related to the default Q10 value used to describe the temperature effect on transformation rates of pesticides in soil. The EFSA Journal 2007, 622, 1– 32, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2008.622. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2008. Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance chlorsulfuron. EFSA Scientific Report 2008, 201, 1– 107. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2009. Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals on request from EFSA. EFSA Journal 2009; 7(12):1438, 358 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1438. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2014. Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance prosulfuron. EFSA Journal 2014; 12(9):3815, 94 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3815. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2015a. Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance triasulfuron. EFSA Journal 2015; 13(1):3958, 78 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.3958. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2015b. Peer Review Report to the conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance thifensulfuron-methyl. Available at www.efsa.europa.eu. EFSA PPR Panel (EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues), 2012. Guidance on Dermal Absorption. EFSA Journal 2012; 10(4):2665, 30 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2665. EFSA SC (European Food Safety Authority, Scientific Committee), 2013. Scientific Opinion on the hazard assessment of endocrine disruptors, EFSA Journal 2013; 11(3):3132 84 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3132. European Commission, 1999. Guidelines for the generation of data concerning residues as provided in Annex II part A, section 6 and Annex III, part A, section 8 of Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, 1607/VI/97 rev.2, 10 June 1999. European Commission, 2000. Technical Material and Preparations: Guidance for generating and reporting methods of analysis in support of pre- and post-registration data requirements for Annex II (part A, Section 4) and Annex III (part A, section 5) of Directive 91/414. SANCO/3030/99 rev.4, 11 July 2000. European Commission, 2002a. Guidance Document on Terrestrial Ecotoxicology Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/10329/2002 rev.2 final, 17 October 2002. European Commission, 2002b. Guidance Document on Aquatic Ecotoxicology Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/3268/2001 rev 4 (final), 17 October 2002. European Commission, 2003. Guidance Document on Assessment of the Relevance of Metabolites in Groundwater of Substances Regulated under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/221/2000-rev. 10 - final, 25 February 2003. European Commission, 2010. Guidance document on residue analytical methods. SANCO/825/00 rev. 8.1, 16 November 2010. European Commission, 2012. Guidance Document on the Assessment of the Equivalence of Technical Materials of Substances Regulated under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/10597/2003 – rev. 10.1, 13 July 2012. FOCUS (Forum for the co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their use), 2001. FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2. 245 pp., as updated by the Generic Guidance for FOCUS surface water scenarios, version 1.1 dated March 2012. FOCUS (Forum for the co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their use), 2007. Landscape And Mitigation Factors In Aquatic Risk Assessment. Volume 1. Extended Summary and Recommendations. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Landscape and Mitigation Factors in Ecological Risk Assessment, EC Document Reference SANCO/10422/2005 v2.0. 169 pp. FOCUS (Forum for the co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their use), 2008. Pesticides in Air: Considerations for Exposure Assessment. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Pesticides in Air, EC Document Reference SANCO/10553/2006 Rev 2 June 2008. FOCUS (Forum for the co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their use), 2009. Assessing Potential for Movement of Active Substances and their Metabolites to Ground Water in the EU. Report of the FOCUS Workgroup, EC Document Reference SANCO/13144/2010-version.1. 604 pp, as outlined in Generic Guidance for Tier 1 FOCUS groundwater Assessment, version 2.0 dated January 2011. JMPR (Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues), 2004. Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues Rome, Italy, 20–29 September 2004, Report 2004, 383 pp. JMPR (Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues), 2007. Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues Geneva, Switzerland, 18–27 September 2007, Report 2007, 164 pp. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2012. Guidance document on standardised test guidelines for evaluating chemicals for endocrine disruption. ENV/JM/MONO(2012)22, 24 August 2012. SETAC (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry), 2001. Guidance Document on Regulatory Testing and Risk Assessment procedures for Plant Protection Products with Non-Target Arthropods. ESCORT 2. United Kingdom, 2015. Revised Renewal Assessment Report on thifensulfuron-methyl, March 2015. Available at www.efsa.europa.eu. United Kingdom, 2014. Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) on the active substance thifensulfuron-methyl prepared by the rapporteur Member State the United Kingdom in the framework of Regulation (EC) No 1141/2010, July 2014. Available at www.efsa.europa.eu. Citing Literature Volume13, Issue7July 20154201 ReferencesRelatedInformation
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
matmoon完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
bobolio完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
6秒前
英俊的铭应助xixixi采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
Zex发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
九月完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
怡然曼容完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
F君发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
cyq完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
wenzheng发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
无限初晴发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
Ain发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
伍万恶完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
ColinWine完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
CipherSage应助csy采纳,获得10
22秒前
852应助无限初晴采纳,获得10
23秒前
王治豪发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
精明的高跟鞋完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
younger完成签到,获得积分20
24秒前
26秒前
oleskarabach发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
忧郁的夏岚完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
29秒前
会飞的猪发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
yaya发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
充电宝应助淡淡从霜采纳,获得10
32秒前
33秒前
xuxu发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
34秒前
潇涯应助骑士采纳,获得30
35秒前
科研通AI2S应助王治豪采纳,获得30
36秒前
yy发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
Herly发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
韵胜完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
fighting完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
高分求助中
Effect of reactor temperature on FCC yield 1500
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 800
Uncertainty Quantification: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, Second Edition 800
The Healthy Socialist Life in Maoist China 600
The Vladimirov Diaries [by Peter Vladimirov] 600
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 555
Mesopotamian Divination Texts: Conversing with the Gods 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3279700
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2917964
关于积分的说明 8388258
捐赠科研通 2588963
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1410444
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 657729
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 638828