The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies

加强流行病学观察研究报告 观察研究 检查表 医学 范围(计算机科学) 队列研究 医学教育 循证医学 梅德林 家庭医学 流行病学 替代医学 心理学 病理 计算机科学 政治学 法学 程序设计语言 认知心理学
作者
Erik von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Stuart Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke
出处
期刊:PLOS Medicine [Public Library of Science]
卷期号:4 (10): e296-e296 被引量:10188
标识
DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296
摘要

Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
科研小白发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
ad无人完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
5秒前
zhangyafei发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
wangxiaobin完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
闪电完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
dxction发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
猫咪也疯狂完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
思源应助JZ1640采纳,获得10
9秒前
迢迢笙箫应助小海豚采纳,获得10
10秒前
木木完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
Jiang发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
聪明摩托发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
鳗鱼盼夏发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
jjy发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
dxction完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
李默庵啊发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
李健的小迷弟应助zhangyafei采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
万能图书馆应助Fancy采纳,获得10
17秒前
领导范儿应助鳗鱼盼夏采纳,获得10
18秒前
njh发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
小蘑菇应助周小花采纳,获得10
19秒前
20秒前
剩饭的狗发布了新的文献求助30
21秒前
如意怀柔完成签到,获得积分20
21秒前
小猫咸菜完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
Diagnostic immunohistochemistry : theranostic and genomic applications 6th Edition 500
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
China's Relations With Japan 1945-83: The Role of Liao Chengzhi 400
Classics in Total Synthesis IV 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3149808
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2800840
关于积分的说明 7842296
捐赠科研通 2458378
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1308434
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 628510
版权声明 601721