Association of Patient Sex With Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Overall Survival in Advanced Cancers

医学 免疫疗法 危险系数 荟萃分析 内科学 随机对照试验 观察研究 临床试验 肿瘤科 梅德林 癌症 置信区间 政治学 法学
作者
Christopher J.D. Wallis,Mohit Butaney,Raj Satkunasivam,Stephen J. Freedland,Sandip Pravin Patel,Omid Hamid,Sumanta K. Pal,Zachary Klaassen
出处
期刊:JAMA Oncology [American Medical Association]
卷期号:5 (4): 529-529 被引量:215
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5904
摘要

Sex-associated differences in immune response are known, but a meta-analysis suggested men, compared with women, derive greater value from immunotherapy for advanced solid-organ malignant neoplasms. However, methodologic concerns and subsequent trials have placed these results in doubt.To perform an updated, comprehensive meta-analysis that assesses the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced cancers according to patient sex.A systematic review of studies (n = 23) indexed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Scopus from inception of these databases to October 2, 2018, was conducted. Randomized clinical trials that compared immunotherapy with standard of care in the treatment of advanced solid-organ malignant neoplasms were included if overall survival was reported as an outcome and if data stratified by patient sex were available. Observational studies, editorials, commentaries, review articles, non-peer-reviewed publications, studies that compared various immunotherapy regimens, studies that reported other measures of oncologic response, and studies that reported subgroup analyses for 1 sex only were excluded.Overall survival, with a test for heterogeneity between women and men, to assess the null hypothesis that no difference in the survival advantage of immunotherapy exists by patient sex.This meta-analysis included 23 randomized clinical trials that reported on 9322 men (67.9%) and 4399 women (32.1%); the age of most patients was in the 70s. An overall survival benefit of immunotherapy was found for both men (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81; P < .001) and women (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.88; P = .002). Random-effects meta-analysis of study-level differences in response to immunotherapy demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the sexes (I2 = 38%; P = .60). Subgroup analyses according to disease site, line of therapy, class of immunotherapy, study methodology, and representation of women recapitulated these findings.Stratified analyses demonstrated no statistically significant association of patient sex with the efficacy of immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced cancers using overall survival as the outcome.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
jade发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
钟梓袄发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
自由莺发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
沈阳四季完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
佛光辉发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
子非愚完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
深情安青应助王大好人采纳,获得10
5秒前
所所应助幽默尔蓝采纳,获得10
5秒前
深情安青应助西瓜采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
大力的灵雁应助古月方源采纳,获得10
6秒前
JJ完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
直率凝丝发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
ee发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
chc发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
可爱的函函应助g123采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
科目三应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
寒冷不言应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
香蕉觅云应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
Lance应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2000
Pulse width control of a 3-phase inverter with non sinusoidal phase voltages 777
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Research Methods for Applied Linguistics: A Practical Guide 600
Research Methods for Applied Linguistics 500
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 15 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6407014
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8226157
关于积分的说明 17445918
捐赠科研通 5459684
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2885038
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1861367
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1701802