Association of Patient Sex With Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Overall Survival in Advanced Cancers

医学 免疫疗法 危险系数 荟萃分析 内科学 随机对照试验 观察研究 临床试验 肿瘤科 梅德林 癌症 置信区间 政治学 法学
作者
Christopher J.D. Wallis,Mohit Butaney,Raj Satkunasivam,Stephen J. Freedland,Sandip Pravin Patel,Omid Hamid,Sumanta K. Pal,Zachary Klaassen
出处
期刊:JAMA Oncology [American Medical Association]
卷期号:5 (4): 529-529 被引量:215
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5904
摘要

Sex-associated differences in immune response are known, but a meta-analysis suggested men, compared with women, derive greater value from immunotherapy for advanced solid-organ malignant neoplasms. However, methodologic concerns and subsequent trials have placed these results in doubt.To perform an updated, comprehensive meta-analysis that assesses the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced cancers according to patient sex.A systematic review of studies (n = 23) indexed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Scopus from inception of these databases to October 2, 2018, was conducted. Randomized clinical trials that compared immunotherapy with standard of care in the treatment of advanced solid-organ malignant neoplasms were included if overall survival was reported as an outcome and if data stratified by patient sex were available. Observational studies, editorials, commentaries, review articles, non-peer-reviewed publications, studies that compared various immunotherapy regimens, studies that reported other measures of oncologic response, and studies that reported subgroup analyses for 1 sex only were excluded.Overall survival, with a test for heterogeneity between women and men, to assess the null hypothesis that no difference in the survival advantage of immunotherapy exists by patient sex.This meta-analysis included 23 randomized clinical trials that reported on 9322 men (67.9%) and 4399 women (32.1%); the age of most patients was in the 70s. An overall survival benefit of immunotherapy was found for both men (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81; P < .001) and women (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.88; P = .002). Random-effects meta-analysis of study-level differences in response to immunotherapy demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the sexes (I2 = 38%; P = .60). Subgroup analyses according to disease site, line of therapy, class of immunotherapy, study methodology, and representation of women recapitulated these findings.Stratified analyses demonstrated no statistically significant association of patient sex with the efficacy of immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced cancers using overall survival as the outcome.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
古月完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Jackson完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
geather完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
害羞破茧完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
跳跃的以蕊完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
xu发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助李健采纳,获得10
6秒前
zjc1111完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
passion发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
MZ发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
long发布了新的文献求助50
9秒前
kchrisuzad完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
lss发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
13秒前
hay发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
东海帝皇完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
Lucas应助xu采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
高高问柳完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
Jasper应助zhonghy0219采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
jjj发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
baisefengche完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
小刘完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
lss完成签到,获得积分20
18秒前
小俞发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
高分求助中
Continuum thermodynamics and material modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Healthcare Finance: Modern Financial Analysis for Accelerating Biomedical Innovation 2000
Applications of Emerging Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology 1111
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 1000
工业结晶技术 880
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 纳米技术 内科学 物理 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3490203
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3077204
关于积分的说明 9148048
捐赠科研通 2769368
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1519705
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 704187
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 702113