Association of Patient Sex With Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Overall Survival in Advanced Cancers

医学 免疫疗法 危险系数 荟萃分析 内科学 随机对照试验 观察研究 临床试验 肿瘤科 梅德林 癌症 置信区间 政治学 法学
作者
Christopher J.D. Wallis,Mohit Butaney,Raj Satkunasivam,Stephen J. Freedland,Sandip Pravin Patel,Omid Hamid,Sumanta K. Pal,Zachary Klaassen
出处
期刊:JAMA Oncology [American Medical Association]
卷期号:5 (4): 529-529 被引量:215
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5904
摘要

Sex-associated differences in immune response are known, but a meta-analysis suggested men, compared with women, derive greater value from immunotherapy for advanced solid-organ malignant neoplasms. However, methodologic concerns and subsequent trials have placed these results in doubt.To perform an updated, comprehensive meta-analysis that assesses the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced cancers according to patient sex.A systematic review of studies (n = 23) indexed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Scopus from inception of these databases to October 2, 2018, was conducted. Randomized clinical trials that compared immunotherapy with standard of care in the treatment of advanced solid-organ malignant neoplasms were included if overall survival was reported as an outcome and if data stratified by patient sex were available. Observational studies, editorials, commentaries, review articles, non-peer-reviewed publications, studies that compared various immunotherapy regimens, studies that reported other measures of oncologic response, and studies that reported subgroup analyses for 1 sex only were excluded.Overall survival, with a test for heterogeneity between women and men, to assess the null hypothesis that no difference in the survival advantage of immunotherapy exists by patient sex.This meta-analysis included 23 randomized clinical trials that reported on 9322 men (67.9%) and 4399 women (32.1%); the age of most patients was in the 70s. An overall survival benefit of immunotherapy was found for both men (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81; P < .001) and women (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.88; P = .002). Random-effects meta-analysis of study-level differences in response to immunotherapy demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the sexes (I2 = 38%; P = .60). Subgroup analyses according to disease site, line of therapy, class of immunotherapy, study methodology, and representation of women recapitulated these findings.Stratified analyses demonstrated no statistically significant association of patient sex with the efficacy of immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced cancers using overall survival as the outcome.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
2秒前
路咕咕嗼发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
若晨完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
大模型应助有魅力的彩虹采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
CodeCraft应助JIyong采纳,获得10
5秒前
稳重盼夏发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
11秒前
12秒前
辛夷发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
Youyou发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
香蕉觅云应助Ferdinand_Foch采纳,获得10
15秒前
纯牛奶完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
稳稳稳发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
上官若男应助纯真的初夏采纳,获得10
17秒前
JIyong发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
杨艺完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
Ava应助辛夷采纳,获得10
19秒前
Dennis_Ye发布了新的文献求助20
20秒前
合适难胜完成签到,获得积分20
20秒前
21秒前
21秒前
wcy发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
凉风送信发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
xiuxiu酱完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
lan发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Bend stiffness of submarine cables – an experimental and numerical investigation 5000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7541360
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9125330
关于积分的说明 19495973
捐赠科研通 7137571
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3258217
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2425555
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2246367