Association of Patient Sex With Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Overall Survival in Advanced Cancers

医学 免疫疗法 危险系数 荟萃分析 内科学 随机对照试验 观察研究 临床试验 肿瘤科 梅德林 癌症 置信区间 政治学 法学
作者
Christopher J.D. Wallis,Mohit Butaney,Raj Satkunasivam,Stephen J. Freedland,Sandip Pravin Patel,Omid Hamid,Sumanta K. Pal,Zachary Klaassen
出处
期刊:JAMA Oncology [American Medical Association]
卷期号:5 (4): 529-529 被引量:215
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5904
摘要

Sex-associated differences in immune response are known, but a meta-analysis suggested men, compared with women, derive greater value from immunotherapy for advanced solid-organ malignant neoplasms. However, methodologic concerns and subsequent trials have placed these results in doubt.To perform an updated, comprehensive meta-analysis that assesses the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced cancers according to patient sex.A systematic review of studies (n = 23) indexed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Scopus from inception of these databases to October 2, 2018, was conducted. Randomized clinical trials that compared immunotherapy with standard of care in the treatment of advanced solid-organ malignant neoplasms were included if overall survival was reported as an outcome and if data stratified by patient sex were available. Observational studies, editorials, commentaries, review articles, non-peer-reviewed publications, studies that compared various immunotherapy regimens, studies that reported other measures of oncologic response, and studies that reported subgroup analyses for 1 sex only were excluded.Overall survival, with a test for heterogeneity between women and men, to assess the null hypothesis that no difference in the survival advantage of immunotherapy exists by patient sex.This meta-analysis included 23 randomized clinical trials that reported on 9322 men (67.9%) and 4399 women (32.1%); the age of most patients was in the 70s. An overall survival benefit of immunotherapy was found for both men (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81; P < .001) and women (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.88; P = .002). Random-effects meta-analysis of study-level differences in response to immunotherapy demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the sexes (I2 = 38%; P = .60). Subgroup analyses according to disease site, line of therapy, class of immunotherapy, study methodology, and representation of women recapitulated these findings.Stratified analyses demonstrated no statistically significant association of patient sex with the efficacy of immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced cancers using overall survival as the outcome.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
tz发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
maun222发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
荧123456完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
静静呀应助暖阳采纳,获得20
4秒前
5秒前
xiaozhao发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
明理诗槐发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
9秒前
9秒前
Tom完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
maun222完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
郭哥发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
ywjkeyantong发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
talpionchen发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
水聿发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
1733发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
suyu发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
英姑应助JFP采纳,获得10
14秒前
李爱国应助默默毛豆采纳,获得10
15秒前
Orange应助默默毛豆采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
云上人发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
NexusExplorer应助heli采纳,获得10
17秒前
lulu发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
明理的问柳完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
颖火虫666完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
20秒前
核桃发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
22秒前
科研通AI2S应助maosq采纳,获得10
22秒前
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
VASCULITIS(血管炎)Rheumatic Disease Clinics (Clinics Review Articles) —— 《风湿病临床》(临床综述文章) 1000
Feldspar inclusion dating of ceramics and burnt stones 1000
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in a Digital Age? 801
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5971712
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7288942
关于积分的说明 15992394
捐赠科研通 5109548
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2744066
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1709783
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1621760