医学
心房颤动
肺静脉
心脏病学
烧蚀
内科学
心房扑动
导管消融
房性心动过速
外科
作者
Guocai Chen,Mingyang Gao,Yiwei Lai,Lihong Huang,Shijun Xia,Zixu Zhao,Xueyuan Guo,Nian Liu,Deyong Long,Jianzeng Dong,Liu He,Xin Du,Songnan Li,Caihua Sang,Changsheng Ma
摘要
ABSTRACT Introduction Pulsed‐field ablation (PFA) is a novel nonthermal ablation approach using rapid electrical pulses to cause cardiac cell apoptosis via electroporation. Our study aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of PFA for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). Methods Thirty‐two consecutive patients diagnosed with PeAF were enrolled in our study. All patients underwent PFA treatment using the strategy including pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) isolation, cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) block, and mitral isthmus (MI) block. Acute and follow‐up procedure outcomes were evaluated, and adverse events related to the ablation procedure were also observed. Results One‐year survival free from atrial tachyarrhythmia post‐ablation was 65.6%. Acute success rates for PVI, LAPW isolation, CTI block, and MI block were 100%, 100%, 96.9%, and 81.3%, respectively. Eleven cases (34.4%) experienced atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence, with eight cases being atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence and three cases being atrial flutter recurrence. Three patients underwent repeat ablation. Minor complications were encountered in four patients with asymptomatic cerebral lesions. Vagal responses were commonly observed during the procedure. No severe coronary vasospasm or severe hemolysis occurred in our cohort. Conclusion PFA with the strategy including PVI, LAPW isolation, CTI block, and MI block is feasible, safe, and associated with a high rate of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence at 1 year in patients with PeAF. Trial Registration This study registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300068980).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI