药理学
药代动力学
兰索拉唑
埃索美拉唑
体内
化学
奥美拉唑
医学
内科学
生物
生物技术
作者
Miao Yan,Zhufeng Wu,Dan Tang,Feng Wang,W. Wu,Ping Xu,Bikui Zhang,Yiping Liu,Da‐Xiong Xiang,Hoan Linh Banh
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.biopha.2018.08.121
摘要
Voriconazole (VRC) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have similar metabolic pathways. The objectives of the study are to evaluate the impact of PPIs on the pharmacokinetics of VRC. Human liver microsomes model was applied to assess the inhibitory effects of PPIs on the metabolism of VRC in vitro. A retrospective study was also carried out to explore the relationship between the plasma VRC trough concentrations and PPIs uses. Patients were divided into six groups: control (n = 166), lansoprazole (LAN, n = 38), esomeprazole (ESO, n = 19), omeprazole (OME, n = 45), pantoprazole (PAN, n = 43), and ilaprazole (ILA, n = 38) groups. All five PPIs showed concentration-dependent inhibitory effects on the VRC metabolism in human liver microsomes, among which LAN, OME and ESO were three of the most potent inhibitors. Consistently, co-administered with LAN, OME and ESO significantly increased the plasma VRC trough levels (p < 0.05), whereas there was no significant association between VRC concentrations and PAN or ILA use. Interestingly, patients in the PPIs groups were more likely to reach the therapeutic VRC range of 1–5.5 μg/mL in steady state when compared with control patients (75–81% VS 69%). In conclusion, although all PPIs showed inhibitory effects on the VRC metabolism in vitro, only LAN, OME and ESO significantly increased VRC plasma concentrations. This study should be helpful for choice of the type of PPIs for patients administered with VRC.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI