鞣花酸
奥司他韦
病毒学
药理学
抗氧化剂
医学
化学
内科学
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)
生物化学
传染病(医学专业)
多酚
疾病
作者
Elitsa Pavlova,Lora Simeonova,G Gegova
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.biopha.2017.12.014
摘要
Influenza pathogenesis comprises a complex cascade of impaired cellular processes resulting from the viral replication and exaggerated immune response accompanied by reactive oxygen species (ROS) burst and oxidative stress, destructing membranous structures and tissues. By classical virological and biochemical methods we compared and evaluated the therapeutic effects of 2.5 mg/kg/day of the antiviral drug – oseltamivir (OS), 500 mg/kg/day of the immune modulator – isoprinosine (IP) and 500 mg/kg/day of the antioxidant agent ellagic acid (EA) with a focus on their combined activities in influenza H3N2 virus-infected mice. The survival, lung pathology and titers, as well as the oxidative stress biomarker thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) in the lungs, liver and blood plasma, correlated to the activities of the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione reductase (GR) were assessed. We found that the viral inhibitor applied together with the immune modulator and the antioxidant exhibited strong therapeutic effects on the survival of the influenza-challenged mice. That effect was mostly pronounced for the triple combination – protection index (PI) of 75.2%, mean survival time (MST) extended by 5.8 days compared to the PBS control and significant reduction of the lung titers by 1.38 Δlg; 2.3 scores lower lung pathology and 8 times reduction of the accumulated TBARS in the lungs and liver on the 5−th day p.i. The enzymatic assays revealed that this combination demonstrated very good protection against the damaging superoxide radicals (83% efficiency of SOD, in comparison to healthy controls 100%). The double combinations of OS with IP and EA also showed protective effects according to the virological analysis – PI of 53.1% and 54.5%. Ten times higher GR activity was observed when the combination EA + OS and monotherapy of EA were applied (96% in comparison to healthy controls 100%). The best antioxidant effect in blood plasma was observed in the EA + IP group – 4 times reduction in the TBARS-content compared to infected controls but it did not have any efficacy on the survival and lung injury.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI