Efficacy and safety of garadacimab, a factor XIIa inhibitor for hereditary angioedema prevention (VANGUARD): a global, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

遗传性血管水肿 医学 安慰剂 内科学 血管性水肿 C1抑制剂 随机对照试验 临床终点 临床试验 不利影响 儿科 外科 免疫学 病理 替代医学
作者
Timothy Craig,Avner Reshef,H Henry Li,Joshua Jacobs,Jonathan A. Bernstein,Henriette Farkas,William H. Yang,Erik S.G. Stroes,Isao Ohsawa,Raffi Tachdjian,Michael Manning,William R. Lumry,Inmaculada Martinez Saguer,Emel Aygören‐Pürsün,Bruce Ritchie,Gordon Sussman,John Anderson,Kimito Kawahata,Yusuke Suzuki,Petra Staubach
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:401 (10382): 1079-1090 被引量:52
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00350-1
摘要

Summary

Background

Hereditary angioedema is a rare and potentially life-threatening genetic disease that is associated with kallikrein–kinin system dysregulation. Garadacimab (CSL312), a novel, fully-human monoclonal antibody that inhibits activated factor XII (FXIIa), is being studied for the prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-monthly subcutaneous administrations of garadacimab as prophylaxis for hereditary angioedema.

Methods

VANGUARD was a pivotal, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial that recruited patients (aged ≥12 years) with type I or type II hereditary angioedema across seven countries (Canada, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Japan, the Netherlands, and the USA). Eligible patients were randomly assigned (3:2) to receive garadacimab or placebo for 6 months (182 days) by an interactive response technology (IRT) system. Randomisation was stratified by age (≤17 years vs >17 years) and baseline attack rate (1 to <3 attacks per month vs ≥3 attacks per month) for the adult group. The randomisation list and code were kept by the IRT provider during the study, with no access by site staff and funding representatives. All patients and investigational site staff, and representatives from the funder (or their delegates) with direct interaction with the study sites or patients, were masked to treatment assignment in a double-blind fashion. Randomly assigned patients received a 400-mg loading dose of subcutaneous garadacimab as two 200-mg injections or volume-matched placebo on day 1 of the treatment period, followed by five additional self-administered (or caregiver-administered) monthly doses of 200-mg subcutaneous garadacimab or volume-matched placebo. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed time-normalised number of hereditary angioedema attacks (number of hereditary angioedema attacks per month) during the 6-month treatment period (day 1 to day 182). Safety was evaluated in patients who received at least one dose of garadacimab or placebo. The study is registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register, 2020-000570-25 and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04656418.

Findings

Between Jan 27, 2021, and June 7, 2022, we screened 80 patients, 76 of whom were eligible to enter the run-in period of the study. Of 65 eligible patients with type I or type II hereditary angioedema, 39 were randomly assigned to garadacimab and 26 to placebo. One patient was randomly assigned in error and did not enter the treatment period (no dose of study drug received), resulting in 39 patients assigned to garadacimab and 25 patients assigned to placebo being included. 38 (59%) of 64 participants were female and 26 (41%) were male. 55 (86%) of 64 participants were White, six (9%) were Asian (Japanese), one (2%) was Black or African American, one (2%) was Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and one (2%) was listed as other. During the 6-month treatment period (day 1 to day 182), the mean number of investigator-confirmed hereditary angioedema attacks per month was significantly lower in the garadacimab group (0·27, 95% CI 0·05 to 0·49) than in the placebo group (2·01, 1·44 to 2·57; p<0·0001), corresponding to a percentage difference in means of –87% (95% CI –96 to –58; p<0·0001). The median number of hereditary angioedema attacks per month was 0 (IQR 0·00–0·31) for garadacimab and 1·35 (1·00–3·20) for placebo. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were upper-respiratory tract infections, nasopharyngitis, and headaches. FXIIa inhibition was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding or thromboembolic events.

Interpretation

Monthly garadacimab administration significantly reduced hereditary angioedema attacks in patients aged 12 years and older compared with placebo and had a favourable safety profile. Our results support the use of garadacimab as a potential prophylactic therapy for the treatment of hereditary angioedema in adolescents and adults.

Funding

CSL Behring.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
biozj发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
红宝石设计局完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
guozizi发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
LF-Scie完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
happywind完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
大模型应助guangshuang采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
在水一方应助努力的璇子采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
在水一方应助哈哈采纳,获得10
14秒前
blance完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
英姑应助赵永刚采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
一区种子选手完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
17秒前
田様应助小乔采纳,获得10
17秒前
英俊的铭应助十三采纳,获得10
18秒前
Nelly发布了新的文献求助30
19秒前
科研通AI5应助想疯采纳,获得10
19秒前
zho发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
Ming发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
yupeijin完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
blance发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
科研通AI5应助认真摆烂采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
丘比特应助言吾采纳,获得10
24秒前
想看文献的人完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
小蘑菇应助白三烯小童鞋采纳,获得10
26秒前
杨大泡泡完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
健壮橘子发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
28秒前
结实的凝天完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
Ava应助garrick采纳,获得10
28秒前
salamu完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
Ming完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
33秒前
想疯发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
Guo发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
Yubo_W完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
Distinct Aggregation Behaviors and Rheological Responses of Two Terminally Functionalized Polyisoprenes with Different Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding Motifs 450
Ciprofol versus propofol for adult sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3670992
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3227908
关于积分的说明 9777594
捐赠科研通 2938090
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1609760
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 760457
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 735959