Effect of Body Mass Index on Effectiveness of CT versus Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain: The DISCHARGE Trial

医学 狼牙棒 胸痛 冠状动脉疾病 危险系数 临床终点 放射科 体质指数 心脏病学 冲程(发动机) 前瞻性队列研究 内科学 随机对照试验 置信区间 心肌梗塞 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 机械工程 工程类
作者
Robert Sykes,Damien Collison,Béla Merkely,Klaus F. Kofoed,Patrick Donnelly,José F. Rodríguez‐Palomares,Andrejs Ērglis,Josef Veselka,Gintarė Šakalytė,Nada Čemerlić Ađić,Matthias Gutberlet,Jonathan D. Dodd,Ignacio Diez,Gershan Davis,Elke Zimmermann,Cezary Kępka,Radosav Vidaković,Marco Francone,Małgorzata Ilnicka-Suckiel,Fabian Plank,Juhani Knuuti,Rita Faria,Stephen Schröder,Colin Berry,Luca Saba,Balázs Ruzsics,Nina Rieckmann,Christine Kubiak,Kristian Schultz Hansen,Jacqueline Müller‐Nordhorn,Pál Maurovich‐Horvat,Andreas Dehlbæk Knudsen,Imre Benedek,Clare Orr,Filipa Valente,Ligita Zvaigzne,Martin Horváth,Antanas Jankauskas,Filip Ađić,Michael Woinke,Stephen Keane,Iñigo Lecumberri,Erica Thwaite,Michael Laule,Mariusz Kruk,Aleksandra Zivanic,Massimo Mancone,Donata Kuśmierz,Gudrun Feuchtner,Mikko Pietilä,Vasco Gama Ribeiro,Tanja Drosch,Christian Delles,Michele Porcu,Michael Fisher,Tamás Bárány,Charlotte Sørum,Rosca Aurelian,Stephanie Kelly,Bruno García del Blanco,Ainhoa Rubio,Bálint Szilveszter,Jawdat Abdulla,Ioana Rodean,Susan Regan,Hug Cuéllar,Milán Vecsey-Nagy,Birgit Jurlander,Roxana Hodaș,Sarah Feger,Mahmoud Mohamed,Lina María Serna‐Higuita,Konrad Neumann,Henryk Dreger,Matthias Rief,Viktoria Wieske,Maros Ferencik,Melanie Estrella,Maria Bosserdt,Peter Martus,Theodora Benedek,Marc Dewey
出处
期刊:Radiology [Radiological Society of North America]
卷期号:310 (2)
标识
DOI:10.1148/radiol.230591
摘要

Background Recent trials support the role of cardiac CT in the evaluation of symptomatic patients suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD); however, body mass index (BMI) has been reported to negatively impact CT image quality. Purpose To compare initial use of CT versus invasive coronary angiography (ICA) on clinical outcomes in patients with stable chest pain stratified by BMI category. Materials and Methods This prospective study represents a prespecified BMI subgroup analysis of the multicenter Diagnostic Imaging Strategies for Patients with Stable Chest Pain and Intermediate Risk of Coronary Artery Disease (DISCHARGE) trial conducted between October 2015 and April 2019. Adult patients with stable chest pain and a CAD pretest probability of 10%–60% were randomly assigned to undergo initial CT or ICA. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke. The secondary end point was an expanded MACE composite, including transient ischemic attack, and major procedure-related complications. Competing risk analyses were performed using the Fine and Gray subdistribution Cox proportional hazard model to assess the impact of the relationship between BMI and initial management with CT or ICA on the study outcomes, whereas noncardiovascular death and unknown causes of death were considered competing risk events. Results Among the 3457 participants included, 831 (24.0%), 1358 (39.3%), and 1268 (36.7%) had a BMI of less than 25, between 25 and 30, and greater than 30 kg/m2, respectively. No interaction was found between CT or ICA and BMI for MACE (P = .29), the expanded MACE composite (P = .38), or major procedure-related complications (P = .49). Across all BMI subgroups, expanded MACE composite events (CT, 10 of 409 [2.4%] to 23 of 697 [3.3%]; ICA, 26 of 661 [3.9%] to 21 of 422 [5.1%]) and major procedure-related complications during initial management (CT, one of 638 [0.2%] to five of 697 [0.7%]; ICA, nine of 630 [1.4%] to 12 of 422 [2.9%]) were less frequent in the CT versus ICA group. Participants with a BMI exceeding 30 kg/m² exhibited a higher nondiagnostic CT rate (7.1%, P = .044) compared to participants with lower BMI. Conclusion There was no evidence of a difference in outcomes between CT and ICA across the three BMI subgroups. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02400229 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
晴晴完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
李昕123完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
2秒前
NexusExplorer应助PlanetaryLayer采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
阿扎尔完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
6秒前
伽古拉40k完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
聪明伊完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
stws发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
小伙子完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
LG关闭了LG文献求助
11秒前
niaho发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
sere发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
wangjialong完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
LuKC完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
长情的立诚完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
yjf完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
小二郎应助筱璞羲采纳,获得10
16秒前
淡忘完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
22秒前
guard发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
看不懂发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
Hello应助高挑的鑫磊采纳,获得10
24秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助Lllll采纳,获得10
27秒前
zdl发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
大力的灵雁应助hanxuepenyun采纳,获得30
29秒前
31秒前
32秒前
32秒前
32秒前
tracy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
32秒前
32秒前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
33秒前
Khr1stINK完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
tracy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
33秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6025305
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7661919
关于积分的说明 16178888
捐赠科研通 5173438
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2768218
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1751624
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1637702