医学
牙槽
牙科
口腔给药
臼齿
上颌骨
口腔正畸科
牙槽突
标识
DOI:10.1080/00016357.2023.2199862
摘要
AbstractAbstractPurpose Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is a routine method for correcting transverse maxillary deficiency. This paper investigated the effect of RME on anchorage alveolar bone and examined the differences between micro-implant-assisted RME and conventional RME.Methods Relevant articles were selected from the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Review Manager software (v.5.3) was used for the pooled analysis and Cochran Q and I2 statistic tests were used to assess the heterogeneity.Results Following conventional RME, the distal buccal alveolar bone thickness and the mesiobuccal alveolar thickness of the maxillary first molars were significantly reduced. Hyrax (standard mean difference [SMD]: −0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.20–0.66) and Haas procedures (SMD: −0.88, 95% CI: −1.40–0.36) significantly reduced the buccal vertical alveolar height of the maxillary first molars. Similar results were obtained for the maxillary first premolars following RME. The thickness of the buccal alveolar bone decreased with conventional RME compared to when using the method assisted by micro-implants.Conclusions Conventional RME can reduce the thickness and vertical height of maxillary alveolar bone, and there is less loss of alveolar bone when using micro-implant-assisted RME. Further research is needed to validate the findings.Keywords: Maxillaryalveolar bonedental periphery Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Author contributionsChen R conceived of the study, participated in its design and data analysis and statistics, drafted the manuscript, read and approved the final manuscript.Data availability statementAll data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI