作者
Guohua Zeng,Zhijian Zhao,Giorgio Mazzon,Margaret S. Pearle,Simon Choong,Andreas Skolarikos,John D. Denstedt,Christian Seitz,Daniel Olvera Pasada,Cristian Fiori,Andrea Bosio,Athanasios Papatsoris,Carlos E. Méndez-Probst,Daniel Perez Fentes,Kah Ann,Qinghui Wu,Oliver Wiseman,Esteban Emiliani,Yasser Farahat,Mehmet İlker Gökçe,Stilianos Giannakopoulos,Ioannis Kartalas Goumas,Bhaskar K. Somani,Thomas Knoll,Jean de la Rosette,Jiehui Zhong,Marcus Vinícius Osorio Maroccolo,lliya Saltirov,Ben H. Chew,Kunjie Wang,S. Lahme,Guido Giusti,Stefania Ferretti,Sung Yong Cho,P. Geavlete,R. Cansino,Guido M. Kamphuis,Daron Smith,Brian R. Matlaga,Khurshid D. Ghani,Norberto Bernardo,Andres D. Silva,Chi‐Fai Ng,Sixing Yang,Xiaofeng Gao,Olivier Traxer,Arkadiusz Miernik,Evangelos Liatsikos,Kandarp Parikh,Mordechai Duvdevani,Antonio Celia,Takahiro Yasui,Albert Aquino,Mohammad Alomar,Vorapot Choonhaklai,Bülent Erkurt,Jonathan Glass,Seshadri Sriprasad,Palle Jørn Sloth Osther,Francis X. Keeley,Glenn M. Preminger,M. Cepeda Delgado,Edgar Beltrán Suárez,Shouxin Zhang,Kemal Sarıca
摘要
Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) has become the preferred treatment modality for nephrolithiasis. However, because of ongoing uncertainties regarding the optimal perioperative management, operative technique, and postoperative follow-up, as well as a lack of standardization for outcome reporting, consensus is needed to achieve more uniform clinical practice worldwide.To develop recommendations for RIRS on the basis of existing data and expert consensus.A protocol-driven, three-phase study was conducted by the European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS) and the International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU). The process included: (1) a nonsystematic review of the literature to define domains for discussion; (2) a two-round modified Delphi survey involving experts in this field; and (3) an additional group meeting and third-round survey involving 64 senior representative members to formulate the final conclusions.The results from each previous round were returned to the participants for re-evaluation of their decisions during the next round. The agreement threshold was set at 70%.The panel included 209 participants who developed 29 consensus statements on the following topics of interest: (1) perioperative infection management; (2) perioperative antithrombotic therapy; (3) fundamentals of the operative technique; and (4) standardized outcome reporting. Although this consensus can be considered as a useful reference for more clinically oriented daily practice, we also acknowledge that a higher level of evidence from further clinical trials is needed.The consensus statements aim to guide and standardize clinical practice and research on RIRS and to recommend standardized outcome reporting.An international consensus on the best practice for minimally invasive surgery for kidney stones was organized and developed by two international societies. It is anticipated that this consensus will provide further guidance to urologists and may help to improve clinical outcomes for patients.