医学
烧心
恶心
呕吐
不利影响
随机对照试验
腹痛
显著性差异
内科学
物理疗法
疾病
回流
作者
David J. Cangemi,Marilia Montenegro,Brennan Spiegel,A LACY
标识
DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002492
摘要
INTRODUCTION: We investigated the efficacy and safety of virtual reality (VR) for functional dyspepsia. METHODS: Patients were randomized 2:1 between active vs sham VR. Symptoms were assessed using the Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) over 2-week. RESULTS: Patients in the active VR group had greater numerical improvement in PAGI-SYM scores (mean difference −0.7; P < 0.001) compared with sham VR (mean difference −0.4; P = 0.032). Active VR led to significant improvements for all PAGI-SYM subscales, except lower abdominal pain, whereas sham only improved heartburn/regurgitation and nausea/vomiting. Half of the total patients reported nonserious adverse effects, although only 1 patient withdrew from the study because of adverse effects. DISCUSSION: VR is safe and results in significant symptom improvement in functional dyspepsia. Larger trials are warranted.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI