土地利用
土地利用、土地利用的变化和林业
土地管理
生命周期评估
土地改良
环境资源管理
农用地
营林
影响评估
环境科学
农林复合经营
生产(经济)
工程类
经济
土木工程
宏观经济学
政治学
公共行政
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0959-6526(00)00024-x
摘要
A review was performed of existing approaches on land use methods for LCA. Two main questions arise: how does land occupation relate to (irreversible) land changes, and what indicators are to be used to describe land use impacts. Most approaches aim at a single or limited number of indices for land use impacts, for data availability reasons. Vascular plant species density is the most common basis for an indicator. Methods using many more indicators may be seen as future sophistications, when data is available over the whole life cycle. For silviculture and agriculture crops multi-indicator scores may be applicable now to compare management techniques. Land use efficiency measured by m2.y is presently seen as the inventory step of land occupation impact assessment, but may also be a separate issue. Land management techniques in fact influence long-term changes and should be assessed as such, or not quantified at all. Further discussion and harmonisation is however required.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI